State v. Crosby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where defendant requested instruction on “the inferences [the jury] may draw,” but declined to elaborate on what inferences he had in mind, and refused multiple requests by court for proffered instruction, objection was not preserved
• holding that where defendant requested instruction on “the inferences [the jury] may draw,” but declined to elaborate on what inferences he had in mind, and refused multiple requests by court for proffered instruction, objection was not preserved
• finding no error where defendant’s nebulous objection to instruction did not reasonably indicate with specificity what he was requesting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Goff
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1970-07-08· cited 21×
• State v. Vuley
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-02-08· cited 19×
• State v. Massey
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-04-16· cited 17×
• State v. Olds
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-02-02· cited 8×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hood
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1963-01-02· cited 46×
• State v. Coburn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1960-11-01· cited 34×
• State v. Brisson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1955-10-04· cited 28×
• State v. Sanford
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1954-10-05· cited 21×
• State v. Marston
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1909-05-31· cited 13×
• State v. Fox
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1962-05-01· cited 8×
• State v. Murray
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1962-11-07· cited 8×