State v. Massey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to infer a knowing waiver from a defendant’s prior work as a paralegal, prior involvement in civil lawsuits, and prior representation by several lawyers in the absence of any indication that the defendant actually “understood the risks of self-representation”
• refusing to infer a knowing waiver from a defendant's prior work as a paralegal, prior involvement in civil lawsuits, and prior representation by several lawyers in the absence of any indication that the defendant actually \understood the risks of self-representation\
• distinguishing Brown by, among other reasons, the fact that the record in Massey did not disclose any colloquy between court and defendant, and defendant’s prior representation by counsel did not establish that anyone told him about risks of representing himself
• court would not infer from the record that the defendant understood the risks of self-representation because he had worked as a paralegal, had been involved in civil lawsuits, and had been represented by several lawyers in the present case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-14· cited 27×
• State v. Erb
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-24· cited 15×
• State v. Culver
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-03-09· cited 9×
• State v. Todd
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-23· cited 8×
• State v. Probst
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-25· cited 4×
• State v. Peltier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 3×
• City of Lake Oswego v. Stafford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-07-12· cited 2×
• State v. Borba
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-21· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Meyrick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 136×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-22· cited 13×