Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/9/2005

State v. Culver

Citations

108 P.3d 104
198 Or. App. 267
2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that a trial court asking the defendant whether he understood that he would be “at a disadvantage” if he represented him- self was insufficient
colloquy in which the trial court asked the defendant whether he understood that he was “at a disadvantage” was insufficient under Meyrick
trial court asking the defendant whether he understood that he would be “at a disadvantage” if he represented himself was insufficient
colloquy in which the trial court asked the defendant whether he understood that he would be “at a disadvantage” if he represented himself was insufficient under Meyrick
applying constitutional harmless error rule to Court of Appeals decisions
applying constitutional harmless error rule to Court of Appeals decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.