Skip to main content

State v. Martinez

Citations

  • 270 Or. App. 423
  • 348 P.3d 285
  • 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the defendant had demonstrated an intent to commit multiple criminal offenses in part because the defendant had already committed first-degree robbery when he then decided to shoot the victim, thereby committing attempted murder
  • applying Barrett 's analysis that underlying felony is not element of associated aggravated murder offense
  • acknowledging “some tension in the [Oregon] 12 UNITED STATES V. LAWRENCE Supreme Court’s case law” as set out in Boots, Pipkin, and State v. Barrett, 10 P.3d 901 (Or. 2000)
  • affirming consecutive sentences under ORS 137.123(5)(a), where a robbery and an attempted murder that occurred during a continuous and uninterrupted course of conduct “began at two distinct moments in time and involved distinct acts”
  • The reference in ORS 137.123(5)(a) to “criminal offense” “directs a trial court’s attention to the nature of a defendant’s offenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadlock, Mooney, Sercombe, Tempore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.