Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/15/2015
State v. Martinez
Citations
- 270 Or. App. 423
- 348 P.3d 285
- 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the defendant had demonstrated an intent to commit multiple criminal offenses in part because the defendant had already committed first-degree robbery when he then decided to shoot the victim, thereby committing attempted murder
- applying Barrett 's analysis that underlying felony is not element of associated aggravated murder offense
- acknowledging “some tension in the [Oregon] 12 UNITED STATES V. LAWRENCE Supreme Court’s case law” as set out in Boots, Pipkin, and State v. Barrett, 10 P.3d 901 (Or. 2000)
- affirming consecutive sentences under ORS 137.123(5)(a), where a robbery and an attempted murder that occurred during a continuous and uninterrupted course of conduct “began at two distinct moments in time and involved distinct acts”
- The reference in ORS 137.123(5)(a) to “criminal offense” “directs a trial court’s attention to the nature of a defendant’s offenses.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hadlock, Mooney, Sercombe, Tempore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Martinez v. CainOregon Supreme Court· 2020-02-21· cited 15×
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-07· cited 9×
- State v. ByamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-15· cited 7×
- State v. GatewoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-16· cited 5×
- United States v. Christopher LawrenceNinth Circuit· 2018-09-18· cited 4×
- Martinez v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-15· cited 2×
- State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-03· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court· 1989-09-26· cited 111×
- State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court· 2000-09-14· cited 96×
- State v. PipkinOregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-12· cited 56×
- State v. TraylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-17· cited 14×
- State v. GARCIA-MENDOZACourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.