Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/16/2012
State v. Martinez
Citations
- 230 Ariz. 382
- 284 P.3d 893
- 641 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 19
- 2012 WL 3870500
- 2012 Ariz. App. LEXIS 135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming unlawful flight conviction when officer “discontinued the pursuit after a few moments”
- “Officer Fortune's testimony that he did not believe Martinez's statements was necessary to explain why Fortune did not continue to investigate the alleged stolen vehicle”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gould, Portley, Timmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
- State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court· 2006-04-26· cited 376×
- State v. MoranArizona Supreme Court· 1986-11-19· cited 189×
- State v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court· 1981-11-06· cited 116×
- State v. DoerrArizona Supreme Court· 1998-11-12· cited 114×
- State v. BoggsArizona Supreme Court· 2008-06-16· cited 91×
- State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-09-05· cited 47×
- State v. ReimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-07-01· cited 22×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-05-31· cited 13×
- State v. FogartyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-08-24· cited 11×
- Herderick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-01-23· cited 10×
- Simkins v. PulleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-09-27· cited 7×
- In re Joel R.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-08-21· cited 7×
- State v. FIIHRCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-12-22· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.