State v. Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n a criminal case, the rules of evidence do not apply at suppression hearings.”
• “[I]n a criminal case, the rules of evidence do not apply at suppression hearings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garcia
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2019-03-08· cited 376×
• State v. Martinez
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2019-03-15· cited 162×
• State v. McCurry
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2017-03-17· cited 30×
• State v. Rowe
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2017-10-10
• State v. Kellogg
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2019-07-30
• State v. Ezzell
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-05-04

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Drope v. Missouri
  Supreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
• State v. Grant
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-04-01· cited 324×
• State v. Hinrichsen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-02-05· cited 131×
• State v. Rask
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-08-26· cited 106×
• State v. Guatney
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1980-12-12· cited 96×
• United States v. Arenburg
  Second Circuit· 2010-05-25· cited 40×
• Hollamon v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-02-08· cited 17×
• State v. Raatz
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-09-23· cited 11×
• State v. Kail
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-02-03· cited 6×