State v. Kail

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a pretrial suppression order based on the defendant’s claim that his section 611.31 right to an interpreter had been violated
• “One who fully understands the arrest and postarrest implied consent proceeding despite having hearing and speech deficiencies is not a ‘person disabled in communication’ and is therefore not entitled to an interpreter.” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 611.31)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).