State v. Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant advised of Miranda rights need not be re-advised half hour later
• the law does not require repetition of Miranda rights within a short period of time and a continuous sequence of events even though defendant's status may actually change in the interim
• the law does not require repetition of Miranda rights within a short period of time and a continuous sequence of events even though defendant's status may actually change in the interim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Salt Lake City v. Carner
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-04-29· cited 43×
• State v. Sampson
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1991-03-15· cited 26×
• State v. Streeter
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1995-08-03· cited 4×
• State v. Pilling
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-05-27· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• State v. Paz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-12-05· cited 82×
• State v. Pyle
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-03-01· cited 57×
• State v. Evans
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-11-10· cited 15×
• State v. Carlsen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1971-02-05· cited 6×