New Mexico Court of Appeals· 11/23/1983
State v. Martinez
Citations
- 673 P.2d 509
- 100 N.M. 532
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- lawyer seeking to remain in case has burden to show that knowledge of confidential matters is merely imputed, not actual
- defendant in habitual criminal prosecution not entitled to disqualification of defense counsel who shared office space with former associate of prosecutor of defendant on prior charges
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walters, Lopez, Neal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Eddie Maes v. John Thomas, Warden and Attorney General of the State of New MexicoTenth Circuit· 1995-01-23· cited 174×
- State v. BarnettNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-07-01· cited 62×
- State v. PenningtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-03-16· cited 61×
- FIRST SMALL BUSINESS INV. CO. OF CA. v. Intercapital Corp. of OregonWashington Supreme Court· 1987-06-11· cited 39×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-10-23· cited 23×
- State v. AaronNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-11-27· cited 21×
- State v. WhiteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-03-29· cited 17×
- State of Tennessee v. Ricky Raymond BryanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-08-04
- Navajo Nation v. MacDonaldNavajo Nation Supreme Court· 1990-09-26
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. SawyerNew York Court of Appeals· 1982-07-02· cited 267×
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-08-29· cited 166×
- State v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 115×
- American Can Company v. Citrus Feed Co.Fifth Circuit· 1971-03-04· cited 101×
- United States v. Louis Leonard Kitchin, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1979-04-09· cited 98×
- Laskey Bros. Of W. Va., Inc. v. Warner Bros, Pictures, Inc. (In Dissolution), Austin Theatre, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. (In Dissolution)Second Circuit· 1955-07-13· cited 84×
- State v. VogenthalerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-03-09· cited 84×
- State v. ChambersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-06-19· cited 55×
- Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court· 1956-01-09· cited 55×
- City of Hoquiam v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1982-06-10· cited 28×
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-04-24· cited 25×
- People v. SawyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-11-13· cited 17×
- Kadish v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionN.D. Illinois· 1982-10-13· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.