Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/6/2021

State v. Martinez

Citations

315 Or. App. 48
499 P.3d 856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial 564 State v. Powers court erred, in light of Skillicorn, in concluding that a the- ory of relevance that employed propensity reasoning was admissible under OEC 404(3) to prove intent
considering whether the trial court “implicitly” understood it was admitting propensity evidence under OEC 404(4)
rejecting argument that refer- ence to “Williams” evidence during argument meant that the court implicitly admitted evidence for character purposes under OEC 404(4) when the parties did not invite the court to make an OEC 404(4) finding
evidence of prior conduct to show sexual purpose was impermissible character evidence under OEC 404(3)
“[W]e agree * * * that the other-acts evidence concerning defendant’s conduct toward C was ‘propensity evidence.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.