Skip to main content

State v. Martin

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 2631

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant's explanations that someone was looking for him or stalking him were not reasonable in light of the totality of circumstances. The jury was in the best position to weigh the evidence and determined that appellant failed to satisfy his burden of proof regarding the affirmative defense of duress.

Judges: Piper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.