State v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conclud- ing that the trial court did not err in refusing to give the defendant’s proposed eyewitness-identification instruction because it was written in a nonneutral way that “drew the jury’s attention to certain factors bearing on the lack of reliability of eyewitness testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-30· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Lawson/James
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-11-29· cited 143×
• State v. Rainey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 73×
• State v. McNally
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-04-20· cited 65×
• Williams v. Portland General Electric Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1952-08-13· cited 34×
• State v. Francis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-12-27· cited 32×
• Brooks v. Bergholm
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1970-06-10· cited 11×
• State v. Marsh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-03-06· cited 9×
• St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Baughman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-02-09· cited 3×