Skip to main content

State v. Martin

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 7431

Syllabus

Neither the jury's conviction of defendant for murder and other offenses nor its rejection of his claim that he acted in self-defense was against the manifest weight of the evidence. The jury instructions on self-defense and the \castle doctrine\ were accurate and complete and did not mislead the jury. Defense counsel did not act ineffectively in presenting defendant's claim of self-defense. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.