State v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• tampering under ORS 162.285(l)(b) requires proof that the inducement occurred after the witness had been served with a subpoena
• tampering under § 162.285(1)(b) requires proof that the inducement occurred VASQUEZ-VALLE V. SESSIONS 17 after the witness had been served with a subpoena

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Yascavage
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2004-11-30· cited 63×
• State v. Campbell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-08· cited 7×
• Orlando Vasquez-Valle v. Jefferson Sessions, III
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-08-10· cited 6×
• State v. Castillo
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-04-22· cited 5×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Martin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-06-13· cited 3×
• State v. Tweed
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Krummacher
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-06-27· cited 170×
• State v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-04-05· cited 6×
• State v. Wagner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-22· cited 4×
• State v. Crawford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-04-06· cited 2×