State v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a general motion for judgment of acquittal without spec- ifying any theory is insufficient to preserve defendant’s argu- ments
• holding that a general motion for judgment of acquittal without spec- ifying any theory is insufficient to preserve defendant’s argu- ments
• declining to correct error in failing to acquit the defendant of charges because, if the defendant “had adequately raised his objection in the trial court, the court could have remedied the error by allowing the state to reopen its case to produce additional evidence”
• “One of the policies underlying the preservation require- ment is that of allowing the opposing party the opportunity to respond to the asserted error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-08· cited 9×
• State v. Kinsey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-01· cited 8×
• Orlando Vasquez-Valle v. Jefferson Sessions, III
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-08-10· cited 6×
• State v. Welsh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-19· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
• State v. Hitz
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-12-20· cited 253×
• Davis v. O'BRIEN
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-06· cited 135×
• State v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-20· cited 63×
• State v. Paragon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-15· cited 29×
• State v. Glazier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 24×
• State v. Pervish
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-09· cited 20×
• State v. Barboe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 19×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-02-08· cited 7×