Hawaii Supreme Court· 8/19/1980

State v. Martin

Citations

616 P.2d 193
62 Haw. 364
1980 Haw. LEXIS 185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that theft was a continuous offense because the language of the theft statute reflected a legislative intent to prohibit continuing conduct “since two elements of the pertinent crime . . . involve conduct that can extend beyond isolated moments”
finding continuous theft on the state when defendant filed fraudulent public assistance forms
“[E]xercise of control over [] property . . . involve[s] conduct that can extend beyond isolated moments.”
compulsion to produce handwriting exemplars does not contravene the privilege against self-incrimination
compulsion to produce handwriting exemplars did not transgress the Fourth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Ogata, Menor, Lum, Nakamura

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.