Skip to main content

State v. Martin

Citations

  • 535 P.2d 127
  • 56 Haw. 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in the DAG context, that “[d]iscretionary action must be exercised on a case-by-case basis”
  • describing deferred acceptance as part of the “sentencing process” and stressing the importance of considering all available alternatives
  • court erred in not allowing defendant or defense counsel to speak prior to sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Kobayashi, Ogata, Menor, Fong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.