State v. Buchanan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• approving the trial court’s consideration of the offense conduct in denying a 38 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAII REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** DAG motion
• “However persuasive we might regard appellant’s presentation in support of the motion, the reasons expressed by the court in denying the motion are relevant and significant. No abuse of discretion appears.”
• “The record in the present case shows consideration of the [DAG] motion on its merits, and denial of the motion only after review by the court of the circumstances of the offense as well as testimony offered by appellant.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sakamoto
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2003-06-04· cited 22×
• State v. Brown
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1981-02-06· cited 7×
• State v. Karwacki
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1980-08-22· cited 5×
• State v. Satoafaiga.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2022-02-07· cited 5×
• State v. Satoafaiga
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2021-03-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Martin
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1975-05-21· cited 30×
• State v. Gumienny
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1977-08-29· cited 19×