State v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “that the sole purpose of the accident report privilege is to protect the privilege against self-incrimination.”
• “once the accident investigation ends and the criminal investigation begins, the accident report privilege is not applicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ward v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-16· cited 9×
• State v. Whelan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-10· cited 6×
• Smallridge v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-20· cited 5×
• Vedner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-25· cited 5×
• Alexander v. Penske Logistics, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-24· cited 3×
• Wetherington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-16· cited 1×
• State v. Alvarez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-07
• State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Bello
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-10
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. DANIEL BLOCKER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-04-26

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Norstrom
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-01-14· cited 22×
• State v. Marshall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-14· cited 12×
• State v. Riley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-13· cited 6×