State v. Norstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statements made after police \changed hats\ and began conducting a criminal investigation were admissible because Miranda warnings were administered
• officer “acknowledged that she made the ‘changing hats’ remark as a way to signify to [Norstrom] that she was going from the 5 accident portion of the investigation into the criminal portion of the investigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).