Skip to main content

State v. Marshall

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 3132

Syllabus

POSTCONVICTION — DNA TESTING — OUTCOME DETERMINATIVE: The common pleas court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's postconviction application for DNA testing of a shell casing found at the crime scene where an exclusionary result would not have been outcome determinative: even if another person's DNA was present, it would only suggest that another person loaded the gun, not that defendant was not the shooter in light of other evidence presented at trial implicating defendant.

Judges: Zayas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.