State v. Marcum
Citations
- 2020 ND 50
Syllabus
Exclusion of evidence is not the proper remedy when law enforcement acts in good faith upon objectively reasonable reliance that a warrant was properly issued. Sufficient competent evidence capable of supporting the district court's findings exists, and its decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Sufficient evidence supports finding the defendant had a prior conviction for an equivalent offense, and residue in a pipe supports the conviction for possession of methamphetamine.
Judges: Crothers, Daniel John
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-11-22· cited 47×
- State v. HeitzmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-07-20· cited 45×
- State v. GenreNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-04-19· cited 39×
- State v. DemaraisNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-07-21· cited 29×
- State v. SaizSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-08-03· cited 29×
- State v. HerrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-01-25· cited 29×
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-06-28· cited 27×
- State v. KurucNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 27×
- State v. DodsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-12-02· cited 26×
- State v. TreisNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-07-13· cited 25×
- State v. NehringNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-12-02· cited 19×
- State v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-03-11· cited 16×
- State v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-02-23· cited 15×
- State v. MarcumNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-02-27· cited 14×
- State v. TollefsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-05-06· cited 13×
- State v. ChristianNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-03-22· cited 13×
- State v. MohamudNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-04-11· cited 10×
- State v. JohnsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-08-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.