Skip to main content

State v. Maples

Citations

  • 171 Wash. App. 44
  • 286 P.3d 386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statutory provision did not apply retrospectively based on “bedrock principle that the legislature cannot contravene an existing judicial construction of a statute”
  • holding that statutory provision did not apply retrospectively based on “bedrock principle that the legislature cannot contravene an existing judicial construction of a statute”
  • “Notably, the Hale decision did not overrule Stewart, nor could it, as Stewart rested on the bedrock principle that the legislature cannot contravene an existing judicial construction of a statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deren, Hunt, Worswick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.