Court of Appeals of Washington· 10/2/2012
State v. Maples
Citations
- 171 Wash. App. 44
- 286 P.3d 386
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statutory provision did not apply retrospectively based on “bedrock principle that the legislature cannot contravene an existing judicial construction of a statute”
- holding that statutory provision did not apply retrospectively based on “bedrock principle that the legislature cannot contravene an existing judicial construction of a statute”
- “Notably, the Hale decision did not overrule Stewart, nor could it, as Stewart rested on the bedrock principle that the legislature cannot contravene an existing judicial construction of a statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deren, Hunt, Worswick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court· 1988-01-28· cited 328×
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-04· cited 204×
- In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1992-07-23· cited 159×
- Hale v. Wellpinit School Dist. No. 49Washington Supreme Court· 2009-01-15· cited 108×
- Hale v. Wellpinit School District No. 49Washington Supreme Court· 2009-01-15· cited 102×
- McClarty v. Totem Elec.Washington Supreme Court· 2006-07-06· cited 95×
- McClarty v. Totem ElectricWashington Supreme Court· 2006-07-06· cited 93×
- Barstad v. Stewart Title Guar. Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 59×
- Barstad v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 57×
- Lummi Indian Nation v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 2010-10-28· cited 34×
- In Re Personal Restraint of StewartCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-03· cited 27×
- In re the Personal Restraint of StewartCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-03· cited 25×
- In Re CapelloCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-04· cited 20×
- In re the Personal Restraint of CapelloCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-04· cited 20×
- State v. MaplesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-09-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.