State v. Mann
Citations
- 39 Wash. 144
- 81 P. 561
- 1905 Wash. LEXIS 832
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law—Trial—Witnesses—Exclusion of Codefendant From Room. The exclusion from the court room of one jointly-informed against with defendant, together with all other witnesses whose names were indorsed as witnesses for the state, is not prejudicial error, where, upon the conclusion of the opening statement of the prosecuting attorney, such codefendant was permitted to return and remained throughout the trial, and there is no- claim that prejudice resulted.</p> <p>Criminal Law—Joint Complaint Against Husband and Wife— Conspiracy—Arson—Information—Sufficiency. The information charging the defendant with aiding and abetting his wife in the commission of arson, is not insufficient in that it attempts to charge a conspiracy by a husband and wife, since it charges a consummated offense and not a conspiracy to commit an offense.</p> <p>Evidence—Best and Secondary. Oral evidence of the contents of an insurance policy is admissible when the policy is in the possession of the accused and on demand he fails to produce it, although the witness made a record of its contents and was- compelled to refer thereto to refresh his memory.</p> <p>Trial—Evidence—Cross-Examination oe Witness. It is improper to ask upon cross-examination if the witness is not the “notorious R who was tarred and feathered at G.”</p> <p>Criminal Law—Arson—-Evidence—Shipping Goods Prom Building—Time—Remoteness. Upon a prosecution for arson, evidence that the accused shipped merchandise from the building, five and seven days before the fire, is admissible to show motive and to connect the accused with the crime, its remoteness in point of time only lessening its force.</p> <p>Criminal Law—Evidence—Admissions—Voluntary. Evidence of admissions made by the accused to officers while in custody are admissible without a direct statement that they were not made under the influence of fear produced by threats, when it appears from all that occurred that they were voluntarily made.</p> <p>Criminal Law—Evidence—
Judges: Crow, Dunbar, Fullerton, Hadley, Mount
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Kansas v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-04-10· cited 46×
- State v. WhitfieldWashington Supreme Court· 1924-03-28· cited 44×
- Crowell v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1913-11-18· cited 36×
- Riblet v. Ideal Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1959-10-22· cited 25×
- State v. WeaverWashington Supreme Court· 1962-05-31· cited 22×
- State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court· 1964-11-05· cited 20×
- Gill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1964-01-24· cited 20×
- State v. ElderWashington Supreme Court· 1924-09-22· cited 19×
- State v. NistWashington Supreme Court· 1911-11-25· cited 16×
- State v. DaltonWashington Supreme Court· 1906-07-27· cited 14×
- State v. LydaWashington Supreme Court· 1924-04-22· cited 11×
- People v. TunnacliffMichigan Supreme Court· 1965-05-10· cited 10×
- State v. BeebeWashington Supreme Court· 1912-01-04· cited 9×
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court· 1917-08-14· cited 9×
- State v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court· 1910-01-08· cited 8×
- State v. VaneWashington Supreme Court· 1919-01-22· cited 7×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SurryWashington Supreme Court· 1900-12-29· cited 38×
- Givens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1899-12-06· cited 18×
- State v. McCauleyWashington Supreme Court· 1897-05-21· cited 11×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1872-07-15· cited 10×
- Pacific Coast Trading Co. v. Bellingham Bay Base Ball Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 1897-12-11· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.