State v. Mangan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding similar instruction harmless because \there was nothing to suggest [the defendant's accomplice] (or anyone else) had committed some other crime of which Mangan was possibly unaware.\
• holding similar instruction harmless because “there was nothing to suggest [the defendant’s accomplice] (or anyone else) had committed some other crime of which Mangan was possibly unaware”
• choosing to review instruction without considering whether issue properly preserved below
• choosing to review instruction without considering whether issue properly preserved below

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-09· cited 45×
• State v. Israel
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-09· cited 42×
• State v. Stovall
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-18· cited 16×
• State v. Stovall
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-17· cited 14×
• State v. Mangan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-11-13· cited 5×
• State v. Malvern
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-04· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Roberts
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 341×
• State v. Cronin
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 186×
• State v. Stein
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-07-12· cited 156×
• State v. Morris
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-05-23· cited 24×