Court of Appeals of Washington· 11/13/2001
State v. Mangan
Citations
- 34 P.3d 254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding similar instruction harmless because \there was nothing to suggest [the defendant's accomplice] (or anyone else) had committed some other crime of which Mangan was possibly unaware.\
- holding similar instruction harmless because “there was nothing to suggest [the defendant’s accomplice] (or anyone else) had committed some other crime of which Mangan was possibly unaware”
- choosing to review instruction without considering whether issue properly preserved below
- choosing to review instruction without considering whether issue properly preserved below
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-09· cited 45×
- State v. IsraelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-09· cited 42×
- State v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-18· cited 16×
- State v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-17· cited 14×
- State v. MalvernCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-04· cited 4×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 341×
- State v. CroninWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 186×
- State v. SteinWashington Supreme Court· 2001-07-12· cited 156×
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-05-23· cited 24×
- State v. ManganCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-11-13· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.