State v. Manfredonia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “there is an inference from the existence of a blank for the name of defendant’s lawyer and from the absence of any evidence to the contrary that defendant was not represented by counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Probst
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-12-22· cited 61×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-14· cited 27×
• State v. Holliday
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-01-08· cited 11×
• State v. Crain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-25· cited 4×
• State v. Probst
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-25· cited 4×
• State v. Riggins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-04-10· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Grenvik
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-05-27· cited 77×
• City of Pendleton v. Standerfer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-05· cited 27×
• State v. Winkler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-23· cited 4×