Skip to main content

State v. Mandanas

Citations

  • 228 P.3d 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts must impose multiple firearm enhancements even where the underlying crimes constitute the same criminal conduct
  • addressing the imposition of multiple enhancements for multiple enhancement-eligible offenses that amount to the same criminal conduct
  • Appellate courts look to a statute's plain language in order to fulfill its obligation and give effect to legislative intent.
  • Appellate courts look to a statute’s plain language in order to fulfill its obligation and give effect to legislative intent.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.