Skip to main content

State v. Maldonado

Citations

  • 209 N.E.3d 213
  • 2023 Ohio 522

Syllabus

Crim.R. 43(A) sentencing remand correction of entry days-of-confinement credit. Affirmed. Under Crim.R. 43(A), a defendant's presence is not required at any proceeding solely intended to vacate or delete any portion of a sentence, punishment, penalty, or other criminal sanction upon remand from a direct appeal and because no sentence was imposed de novo, the defendant is not entitled to another days-of-confinement calculation upon remand.

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.