United States v. Bonnie Burnette Erwin, Also Known as Carlos Erwin, Also Known as Ralph Erwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a downward correction of an illegal sentence does not constitute resentencing requiring the presence of a defendant”
• concluding that the district court’s entry of an amended judgment, which re-entered a portion of the prisoner’s sen- tence, was a \correction\ of the sentence, not a resentencing
• affirming district court’s decision to modify prisoner’s sentence to account for vacated conviction without conducting a resentencing because the modification was “a downward correction of [the prisoner’s] illegal sentence”
• dating clarifications of the guidelines have retroactive application “final judgment” from time of void judgment
• affirming district court’s decision to modify prisoner’s sentence to account for vacated conviction without conducting a resentencing because the modification was “a downward correction of [the prisoner’s] illegal sentence”
• affirming district court’s decision to modify prisoner’s sentence to account for vacated conviction without con- ducting a resentencing because the modification was \a downward correction of [the prisoner’s] illegal sentence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).