State v. Maldonado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The trial court’s failure to impanel the lawful number of jurors was fundamental error requiring reversal and a new trial.”
• \The trial court's failure to impanel the lawful number of jurors was fundamental error requiring reversal and a new trial.\
• “Although [the defendant] stipulated to a lesser number of jurors, the improper denial of a twelve-person jury nonetheless is fundamental error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Le Noble
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-07-31· cited 16×
• State v. Kuck
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-02-23· cited 7×
• State v. Escobedo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-08-11· cited 4×
• State v. Jernigan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-01-13· cited 2×
• State v. Hung Manh Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-06-22· cited 2×
• State v. Kuck
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-04-21
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-07

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Arredondo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-12-03· cited 115×
• State v. Gordon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-18· cited 105×
• State v. Butrick
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-28· cited 41×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-09-23· cited 38×
• State v. Arnoldi
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-04-13· cited 25×
• State v. Luque
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-12· cited 20×
• State v. Uriarte
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-08-27· cited 19×
• State v. Prince
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 17×
• State v. Fancy
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-10-20· cited 16×