Skip to main content

State v. Majid

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 189

Syllabus

Postconviction relief R.C. 2953.21(A)(1) de novo motion to correct sentence void voidable jurisdiction. The trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider defendant's untimely petition for postconviction relief under R.C. 2953.21(A)(1). Under the Ohio Supreme Court's current jurisprudence, any sentencing error would be voidable, not void and defendant was limited to challenging his sentence via a direct appeal. Therefore, the trial court did not err by summarily denying defendant's motion to correct sentence.

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.