Supreme Court of Missouri· 8/3/1999
State v. Madison
Citations
- 997 S.W.2d 16
- 1999 Mo. LEXIS 49
- 1999 WL 562160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant must demonstrate actual prejudice to be entitled to relief even if charging instrument was incorrect
- \The standard of review for denial of a motion for post-conviction relief is whether the motion court's findings and conclusions were clearly erroneous.\
- even if the charging document was incorrect, the defendant must still demonstrate actual prejudice
- a jury is presumed to know and follow the instructions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael A. Wolff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-01-10· cited 259×
- Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-04-22· cited 123×
- State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-06-17· cited 120×
- State v. GlassSupreme Court of Missouri· 2004-07-01· cited 111×
- State v. JohnsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2000-12-05· cited 104×
- State v. RutterSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-12-24· cited 62×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri· 2000-12-05· cited 57×
- State v. ZinkSupreme Court of Missouri· 2005-11-22· cited 49×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2004-02-24· cited 46×
- State v. NaylorSupreme Court of Missouri· 2017-03-14· cited 46×
- State v. RoseMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-07-30· cited 43×
- State v. HiblerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-27· cited 42×
- McNeal v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-11-12· cited 42×
- Jeremaine Perry v. Michael KemnaEighth Circuit· 2004-03-16· cited 35×
- State v. BuchliMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-09-28· cited 35×
- Children International v. Ammon Painting Co.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-12-12· cited 34×
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-12-20· cited 25×
- Yates v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-02-15· cited 21×
- Shifkowski v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-06-23· cited 20×
- State of Missouri v. Jose F. FloresMissouri Court of Appeals· 2014-05-13· cited 17×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-03-26· cited 285×
- State v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-01-26· cited 159×
- State v. PrestonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-05-15· cited 125×
- Fahy v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1987-11-17· cited 65×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-12-18· cited 64×
- State v. HeslopSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-11-24· cited 42×
- State v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-08-04· cited 25×
- Valdiosera-Godinez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-05-17· cited 24×
- State v. McKeeMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-01-14· cited 21×
- State v. MorrowMissouri Court of Appeals· 1994-12-01· cited 18×
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-01-05· cited 18×
- Beis v. DiasMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-07-16· cited 18×
- State v. GottsmanMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-07-31· cited 13×
- Fox v. FergusonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-02-14· cited 10×
- State v. CusumanoMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-10-22· cited 10×
- State v. LoweryMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-08-06· cited 8×
- State v. TunstallMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-02-16· cited 7×
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-03-31· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.