Skip to main content

State v. MacHado

Citations

  • 127 P.3d 941
  • 109 Haw. 445
  • 2006 Haw. LEXIS 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the complainant's statement was not admissible as an excited utterance in part because it \involved a lengthy narrative of the events of an entire evening\
  • holding that the complainant’s statement was not admissible as an excited utterance in part because it “involved a lengthy narrative of the events of an entire evening”
  • holding that \there [was] no reasonable possibility that error might have contributed to Petitioner's conviction\ (brackets and quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that the complaining witness \remained visibly upset as she described what had transpired\
  • noting that the complaining witness “remained visibly upset as she described what had transpired”
  • describing ten minute time period between violent incident and police officer's arrival as \short\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.