Skip to main content

State v. Lynch

Citations

  • 1998 MT 308
  • 969 P.2d 920
  • 292 Mont. 144
  • 55 State Rptr. 1278
  • 1998 Mont. LEXIS 296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when evidence was obtained legally in Nevada, but search would have been illegal in Montana, evidence was inadmissible in Montana because exclusionary rule is rule of evidence and evidentiary rules of forum state apply
  • “[This question] is purely one of law over which our review is plenary.”
  • “[Q]uestions concerning evidence admissibility and exclusion typically involve procedural considerations[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray, Hunt, Nelson, Regnier, Turnage

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.