State v. Hanley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If a state chooses to allow electronic surveillance by adopting, a statutory scheme, the scheme must be at least as or more restrictive than the regulations of Title III.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Manuela Villa v. Maricopa County
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-08-02· cited 47×
• State v. Lynch
  Montana Supreme Court· 1998-12-15· cited 22×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Berger v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 1,212×
• State v. Brackman
  Montana Supreme Court· 1978-08-04· cited 59×
• Halpin v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1972-04-24· cited 58×
• People v. Conklin
  California Supreme Court· 1974-06-12· cited 39×
• State v. Farha
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-12-13· cited 31×