State v. Lyman
Citations
- 2022 ND 160
Syllabus
Whether to grant a mistrial is within the district court's discretion, which this Court will not reverse on appeal absent an abuse of such discretion. In reviewing a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, this Court first determines whether the prosecutor's actions were misconduct, then examines whether the misconduct had prejudicial effect. The purpose of an opening statement is to inform the jury about the case and to outline to the jury the proof the State expects to present. Curative jury instructions will generally remove prejudice caused by improper statements because the jury is presumed to follow the district court's instruction.
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SchimmelNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-06-30· cited 60×
- State v. MarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1967-09-19· cited 30×
- State v. Pena GarciaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-01-12· cited 20×
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-06-30· cited 17×
- State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-05-07· cited 10×
- State v. BazileNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-03-17· cited 8×
- State v. LymanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-08-18· cited 7×
- City of Bismarck v. SokalskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-05-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.