State v. Bazile
Citations
- 971 N.W.2d 884
- 2022 ND 59
Syllabus
In reviewing a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, this Court first determines whether the prosecutor's actions were misconduct, then examines whether the misconduct had a prejudicial effect. A curative jury instruction generally removes prejudice caused my improper statements because the jury is presumed to follow a court's instruction. The North Dakota Rules of Criminal Procedure do not require a district court to state findings on the record when a motion is made during trial.
Judges: Crothers, Daniel John
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LymanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-08-18· cited 7×
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-04-26· cited 7×
- State v. GrensteinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-12-05· cited 4×
- State v. HannessonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-04-26· cited 3×
- State v. KennedyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-07-17· cited 3×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.