Skip to main content

State v. Luther

Citations

  • 134 P.3d 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that admission of sexually suggestive images, possessed by the defendant, was permissible because itwas relevant to the defendant's intent to attempt to possess child pornography
  • Under the attempt statute, “the critical focus is on the defendant’s criminal intent and not on the fact that no minors were actually subjected to sexual exploitation or abuse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.