State v. Lunsford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In telling the jury, ‘so don’t fall for that,’ the solicitor was merely telling the jury that it should not credit defense counsel’s argument regarding the absence of fingerprint evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cock-N-Bull Steak House, Inc. v. Generali Insurance
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-01-22· cited 73×
• State v. Whipple
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-07-01· cited 50×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 31×
• State v. Rudd
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-08-04· cited 8×
• State v. Liberte
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-08-16· cited 5×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• United States v. Bagley
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
• Darden v. Wainwright
  Supreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
• State v. Durden
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-03-13· cited 56×
• State v. Patterson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-12-29· cited 28×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-06-22· cited 22×
• State v. Scipio
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-12· cited 21×
• State v. Hartley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-01-13· cited 19×
• Osborn v. League Life Insurance
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1969-10-30· cited 10×