State v. Luft
Citations
- 104 Kan. 353
- 179 P. 553
- 1919 Kan. LEXIS 265
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Assault with Intent to Kill — Cross-examination of Defendant— Impeaching Evidence Properly 'Received. The defendant, on trial for assault with intent to kill, claimed he was endeavoring to apprehend the person assaulted for the commission of a crime, and sought to justify the force used. He testified on direct examination, that the person' assaulted fought him. On cross-examination he said the person assaulted fought him with a knife and cut him. He was then impeached by evidence that the wound was not made with a knife at all, and was suffered subsequently to the encounter and at a different place. Held, the impeaching evidence was properly received.</p> <p>2. Same — Verdict of Guilty — New Trial Granted — Order Granting New Trial Subsequently Set Aside — Neio Trial Denied — No error. After verdict of guilty a motion for a new trial was sustained, and the cause was continued- to the next term. Subsequently, but at the same term, a motion to reconsider the ruling was entertained, and hearing of the motion to reconsider was postponed to a stated day of the next 'term. At the next term the motion to reconsider was allowed, and the motion for a new trial was reconsidered and overruled. Held, the court possessed power to pursue thq course taken.</p> <p>3. Same — New Trial — Authority of Court Over the Work of the Term. Section 274 of the code of criminal procedure, providing that the granting of a new trial places the parties in the same situation as if no trial had occurred, has no reference to the power of the court during the term over the work of the term, and contemplates those orders granting new trials which ultimately become final orders on the subject.</p> <p>4. Same. Authority to revise proceedings during the term at which they occurred,' includes authority to require the presence of the defendant whenever necessary.</p> <p>5. Same — Misconduct of Juror — New Trial Properly Denied. The proceedings examined, and held that a n
Judges: Burch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Awadelkariem v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-06-03· cited 195×
- Christian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-27· cited 21×
- Fenn v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1925-03-07· cited 21×
- Hoffman v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1943-04-10· cited 17×
- State v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1928-02-11· cited 11×
- State v. BowserSupreme Court of Kansas· 1941-11-19· cited 9×
- Barstow v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Kansas· 1954-11-13· cited 7×
- United States v. SmithThird Circuit· 1946-07-16· cited 6×
- Buchanan v. LambdinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1954-04-10· cited 5×
- Trustees of the Baker University v. FarrarSupreme Court of Kansas· 1932-03-05· cited 4×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas· 1932-04-09· cited 3×
- State v. BollerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1938-04-09· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. Noble v. LangmadeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-11-10· cited 19×
- State v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-02-10· cited 16×
- State v. FarrarSupreme Court of Kansas· 1918-12-07· cited 16×
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-03-09· cited 15×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-04-12· cited 15×
- State ex rel. Bjorn v. CreagerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-02-12· cited 13×
- State v. SextonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-12-06· cited 12×
- State v. MounkesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-02-07· cited 9×
- Hulett v. HancockSupreme Court of Kansas· 1903-04-11· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.