State v. Alexander
Citations
- 89 Kan. 422
- 131 P. 139
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Criminal Law — State Impeaching its Own Witness — Judicial Discretion. The rule that a party is not allowed to impeach his own witness is subject to exceptions. Where a witness for the state had testified on direct examination to a commotion and to the appearance of a wounded man, and on cross-examination had testified to exclamations made by the wounded man, testimony of another witness for the state that the witness first referred to was drunk at the time is considered admissible in the discretion of the court.</p> <p>2. Homicide — Exclamation of Deceased — Admissible. Where a wounded man coming out of a stairway from an upper room exclaimed, “I’m shot,” and then said, “Take me home,” and being asked “Who shot you?” gave the name of one of three persons who were with him in the room immediately before the shooting, and the wounded man died in about, ten minutes afterwards, his exclamation and answer are admissible in evidence.</p> <p>3. Impeaching Witness — On Collateral Matter — Inadmissible. Evidence should not be admitted to contradict a statement of a witness elicited upon cross-examination upon a purely collateral matter which does not tend to prove or disprove an issue in the case, the contradictory evidence being offered by the party eliciting the statement.</p> <p>4. HoMiciDE^-Fmcfewee of Scuffle Before Shooting — Exclusion Was Error. A witness for the state testified to an encounter-between several persons in which one was shot. A defendant who was present at the affray testified that another, also present, fired the shot. He was then asked whether there was a scuffle before the shooting. In the circumstances shown the evidence was admissible, and an objection on the ground that the question was leading was not well taken, although the objection might have been avoided by relating the entire occurrence.</p> <p>5. Remarks — Of Attorney in Closing Argument — Improper and : Prejudicial. .A remark in the closing argument fo
Judges: Benson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1961-04-08· cited 50×
- State v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Kansas· 1936-04-11· cited 17×
- State v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-02-10· cited 16×
- State v. LuftSupreme Court of Kansas· 1919-03-08· cited 15×
- State v. HaysSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-06-09· cited 12×
- State v. NixonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1922-06-23· cited 11×
- Denver v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1915-07-10· cited 10×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1938-11-05· cited 10×
- State v. BarnettSupreme Court of Kansas· 1943-05-08· cited 10×
- State v. PowersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-04-11· cited 8×
- Lutz v. Peoples State BankSupreme Court of Kansas· 1932-04-09· cited 5×
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1924-12-06· cited 3×
- State v. LomaxSupreme Court of Kansas· 1953-12-12· cited 1×
- Stickney v. Wesley Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-01-20· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.