Skip to main content

State v. Lueck

Citations

  • 212 S.W.3d 630
  • 2006 WL 2380449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that facts on liability were not necessarily relevant to jurisdictional inquiry and did not affect court’s jurisdiction to hear the case
  • stating that facts on liability were not necessarily relevant to jurisdictional inquiry and did not affect court = s jurisdiction to hear the case
  • “[Fjacts pertaining to whether the Department may be found liable under the Whistlebower Act are neither dispositive of, nor relevant to, our jurisdictional inquiry.”
  • “While this evidence [good faith and appropriate law enforcement authority] may negate the Department’s liability under the Whistle-blower Act, it would not, even if true, affect the district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Patterson, Puryear

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.