Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/11/1989
State v. Lucas
Citations
- 783 P.2d 121
- 56 Wash. App. 236
- 1989 Wash. App. LEXIS 385
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the state constitution requires a well-founded suspicion that a probation violation has occurred to justify a warrantless search of a probationer
- under the Fourth Amendment and article 1, section 7, probationers and parolees have a diminished right of privacy permitting a warrantless search if reasonable
- under the Fourth Amendment and article I, section 7, probationers and parolees have a diminished right of privacy permitting a warrantless search if reasonable
- The State has an interest in supervising probationers subject to probation conditions, and therefore probationers \should expect close scrutiny.\
- The State has an interest in supervising probationers subject to probation conditions, and therefore probationers \should expect close scrutiny.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-21· cited 108×
- York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200Washington Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 72×
- York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200Washington Supreme Court· 2008-03-13· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. Arter, K., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-12-28· cited 58×
- State v. CornwellWashington Supreme Court· 2018-03-15· cited 55×
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-04-08· cited 49×
- State v. ReichertCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-11-02· cited 45×
- State v. JardinezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-11-18· cited 31×
- State v. SurgeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-07-12· cited 30×
- State v. ParrisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-08-09· cited 25×
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court· 2001-12-06· cited 21×
- State Ex Rel. Corgan v. KingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-02-08· cited 14×
- State v. WallinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-07· cited 9×
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-08· cited 9×
- State v. WintersteinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-09-11· cited 7×
- State v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-03-31· cited 4×
- State Of Washington v. Brittanie OlsenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-05-24· cited 4×
- State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-01-09· cited 3×
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-10-04· cited 2×
- State of Washington v. Felipe Ronaldo Jardinez, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-11-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.