State v. Loveless

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 4830

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to vacate his conviction for lack of subject matter jurisdiction for crimes that appellant committed prior to him turning 18 years old since appellant was neither \taken into custody\ nor \apprehended\ prior to his 21st birthday so as to provide exclusive subject matter jurisdiction to the juvenile court in accordance with R.C. 2151.23(I). The trial court also did not err by denying appellant's motion to vacate his conviction due to preindictment delay where appellant pled guilty thereby waiving any alleged due process violation arising from the purported preindictment delay.