State v. Love

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• crime of narcotics possession was continuing offense; State was not required to choose between one cache of cocaine found on defendant’s person and another found at residence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-10-25· cited 72×
• State v. Simonson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-08-14· cited 55×
• State v. Locke
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-08-06· cited 45×
• State v. Garman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-09-20· cited 20×
• State v. Garman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-10-04· cited 18×
• State v. Monaghan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-02-07· cited 8×
• State of Washington v. Modesto Bravo Gonzalez Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-04-06· cited 1×
• State Of Washington v. Robert Locke
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-08-06
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-01-07

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Camarillo
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-07-26· cited 730×
• State v. Petrich
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-05-17· cited 556×
• State v. Kitchen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-06· cited 499×
• State v. Crane
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-01-31· cited 189×
• State v. Handran
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-07-25· cited 134×
• United States v. Jerome Berardi
  Seventh Circuit· 1982-04-14· cited 120×
• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-10-11· cited 37×
• State v. Gooden
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-03-14· cited 36×