State v. Garman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• multiple incidents of theft from same victim over time aggregated as a common scheme or plan does not trigger a unanimity requirement
• multiple instances of theft targeting the same victim over time aggregated as common scheme or plan does not require unanimity instruction
• thefts of varying degrees could be aggregated so long as they are part of the same general larcenous scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Knutz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-04-20· cited 42×
• State v. Mermis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-04-09· cited 24×
• Brown v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2002-04-16· cited 11×
• State of Washington v. Gary Bruce Farnworth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-06-01· cited 4×
• State Of Washington, V. Alfonso Aguilar
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-08-21· cited 4×
• State v. Janda
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-10-01· cited 3×
• State Of Washington v. Steven Andrew Janda
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-10-01

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Petrich
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-05-17· cited 556×
• State v. Kitchen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-06· cited 499×
• State v. Lough
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-02-23· cited 287×
• State v. Handran
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-07-25· cited 134×
• State v. Eppens
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-08-05· cited 61×
• State v. Vining
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-05-26· cited 57×
• State v. Love
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-01-16· cited 57×
• State v. Doogan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-06-03· cited 32×
• State v. Atterton
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-04-29· cited 20×
• State v. Garman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-09-20· cited 20×
• State v. Reid
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-05-17· cited 19×