State v. Louser
Citations
- 959 N.W.2d 883
- 2021 ND 89
Syllabus
A district court's role to approve or reject amendments to criminal charges does not violate the separation of powers doctrine. A district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied a motion to amend a criminal charge and rejected a plea agreement. The court followed the legislative directive, explained why the State negotiated the agreement, and explained the court's reasons for rejecting it.
Judges: VandeWalle, Gerald W.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-12-16· cited 335×
- In Re United States of America, United States of America v. Ray Cowan and Jack Jacobsen, Wayne O. Woodruff, Special ProsecutorsFifth Circuit· 1975-12-08· cited 199×
- Smothers v. LewisKentucky Supreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 38×
- State v. HammerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-08-17· cited 27×
- McCullough v. SwansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 26×
- Holbach v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-06-07· cited 19×
- Midthun v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-02-05· cited 18×
- State v. GlaserNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-02-12· cited 18×
- City of Devils Lake v. CorriganNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-02-01· cited 17×
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-06-30· cited 17×
- N.D. Legislative Assembly v. BurgumNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-07-30· cited 17×
- State Ex Rel. Koppy v. GraffNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-05-06· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.