Skip to main content

State v. Lora.

Citations

  • 465 P.3d 745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that impact evidence can be introduced at trial “to impeach a victim’s credibility”
  • applying Uyesugi to determine the prejudicial effect of a complaining witness's erroneously admitted testimony about what it was like to undergo the sexual assault physical examination and what she wished she had done differently around the time of the assault
  • “The admission of [the erroneously admitted] testimony, the manner in which it was presented by the [prosecution], and the reliance upon it during closing argument all demonstrate that this error was highly prejudicial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.