State v. Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the superior court may refuse to consider issues and arguments first raised in a reply in support of a petition for post- conviction relief
• indicating that the superior court has discretion whether to consider claims raised for the first time in the defendant’s reply in a proceeding for post-conviction relief
• holding waiver analysis applies with equal force to “Rule 32 proceedings” and petitioner waived “entirely new claims of ineffective assistance of counsel” raised for the first time in a reply brief
• applying waiver doctrine and finding no abuse of discretion in superior court’s refusal to address arguments raised for first time in reply to PCR petition
• finding arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief to the trial court were waived
• “„The rule that issues not clearly raised in the opening brief are waived‟ serves „to avoid 4 485, ¶ 64, 975 P.2d 75, 93 (1999) (“An objection is sufficiently made if it provides the judge with an opportunity to provide a remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kinney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-10-28· cited 22×
• Fisher v. Edgerton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-09-30· cited 14×
• State v. Nissley
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-10-20· cited 3×
• State of Arizona v. Nathan Douglas Kinney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-10-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mata
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 69×
• Childress Buick Co. v. O'CONNELL
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-10-05· cited 45×
• State v. Ruggiero
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-10-04· cited 44×
• State v. Bishop
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-04-22· cited 16×
• Meiners v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-10-27· cited 14×